Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Batra 271:10

בעא מיניה רבא מרב נחמן בהקנאה מהו אמר ליה בהקנאה אינו צריך

today; the fruit after [my] death'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the case of a divorce, such a division in the meaning of the two parts of the expression is, of course, impossible. ');">²⁶</span> R. JOSE SAID: THIS IS NOT NECESSARY. Rabbah b. Abbuha was indisposed [and] R. Huna and R. Nahman came in [to see him]. 'Ask him', said R. Huna to R. Nahman,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [R. Nahman was Rabbah b. Abbuha's son-in-law.] ');">²⁷</span> '[is] the <i>halachah</i> in accordance with [the view of] R. Jose or [is] the <i>halachah</i> not in accordance with [the view of] R. Jose?' — 'I do not [even] know R. Jose's reason, replied the other, '[shall] I ask him<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rabbah. ');">²⁸</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Batra 271:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.